This is a little bit harsh. We are not the best people to judge based on the quality of an idea. We are not the best judges of the quality of a product. We are not the best judges of the quality of a person.
There are a lot of things to love about sorting children into gifted school programs. First, those children who are gifted are generally the brightest. Second, because the programs are voluntary, gifted children are often at a disadvantage because they have to choose among a much smaller population than non-gifted kids. Last, a lot of gifted children are on the lower end of the spectrum, and thus have more difficulty doing well.
The whole “Gifted vs. Non-Gifted” thing can be a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy. If there are less gifted kids, then it is less likely that there are less gifted programs offered. If there are more gifted kids, then it is more likely that there are more gifted programs. In other words, more gifted kids means fewer gifted programs. The same can be said of non-gifted students getting into a gifted school.
While some schools, like gifted programs, may be able to give students more academic rigor, this can also be a disadvantage for those students. If they are given a harder course load, they might not be as confident they can handle the rigor. And if they aren’t given the ability to work to their own potential, they may be left with no motivation to excel. These schools are also more costly.
The truth is, gifted programs are a lot like high schools. There are very few gifted high schools in California, so it’s a lot harder for a student to get into one. Many gifted high schools in California do have gifted programs, but these programs are in-school, not in the classroom. The gifted programs are mainly for students that have a gift or exceptional talent and who have a lot of potential.
Most parents think that gifted programs are “gifted for life,” which makes no sense to them. They are programs intended for kids who have a gift or exceptional talent. I think that the argument that gifted programs are a waste of money is silly, because gifted programs that are just for kids with a gift or exceptional talent are often the most expensive programs. In my opinion, gifted programs are not for kids with a gift or exceptional talent.
I don’t think gifted programs are the least valuable of all things, but I do think there are others. For example, some of the best kids will never really learn to read or write, so why should they be good for their schooling? I think kids who are great at writing, or reading, will do well in school. I think their reading will be good for their brain when they get to school, and they will do a good job, and they will do well in school.
Why should gifted children be better than the rest of the kids? Because the gifted children will get the most benefits from their schooling. I can think of no other reason for that.
I think that’s a good point, I think reading and writing skills are going to be good for them in school. I also think some of these “gifted” kids might be less likely to be a good future employee. I know there are some really gifted kids out there who are just terrible at reading and writing. They will be just as likely to have a terrible future career because of these low skills in reading and writing.
I think the issue is that some of these gifted kids are going to be very bright, but also very bright with other skills and they are going to have difficulty getting jobs where they can apply these skills. The gifted children who are really gifted may not have the opportunities because the jobs are too demanding.